![]()
|
Differences between health-care system: Hungary and Western-European Countries Some of the citation originally issued in dr. Felkai's article Felkai P.: Travel Medicine in Eastern Europe – the Hungarian Way Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 2008,6,195-200
General approach
In the second half of the 20th century, in the Eastern European
region – and despite the theoretically analogous political systems – the
composition of society, the freedom of citizens to move, the economical
and social background: all proved to be quite different in reality.
Despite these, there existed more similar factors too - that were able to
exert a major influence on the birth of travel medicine in the past
COMECON states. These factors make to feel their power even today, so it
proves to be useful, if we start to analyse the tendencies of development
by being conscious of them. 1. All the hospitals in Hungary are State-run, and obviously have service agreement with the National Social Security Insurance Company. Consequently, hospitals’ administration is widely accepts the "European Health Insurance Card".
The EU Card only covers the costs of diseases needing urgent health
provision in the very case that the local health care provider is in
contract with National Health Insurance Company of that state. Of course,
as in Hungary (and in all former socialist states, as well) every health
care service was state-run after World War II, for Hungarians of the
following decades it was quite natural that each kind of financing health
supply was paid by a centralized Social Insurance Institution.
Based on experiences of the historical past, Hungarian travelers were
accustomed to a claim behavior to enjoy the same health care provision as
at home. With the adherence to the European Union with autonomous social
care systems, however, the conditions changed: former East-West and
East-East inter-state treaties were replaced by a limited form of care
provided by the "European Health Insurance Card". As the far overwhelming
majority of Hungarian citizens does travel into European Union countries,
the belief held fast that after the adherence to the EU no travel
insurance at all will be necessary. As the far overwhelming majority of
Hungarian citizens does travel into European Union countries, the belief
held fast that after the adherence to the EU no travel insurance at all
will be necessary. 2. The hierarchic structure of health care meant rigidity in the health-care system. In fact, the population failed to possess a free doctor choice possibility: (this is only a theoretical possibility) so, in case of a disease, everybody had to go to „his" district physician according to the place of residence. In the very case a sick needed a hospital care, he got a placement on a bed in the district hospital too.
3. The majority of Hungarian hospitals failed to possess – and continues to do so even today – clinical wards covering all medical specialties. This situation is characteristic to the Budapest hospitals. Consequently, those patients - who were forced into hospitalization by diagnosis - could be directed by the GP or the emergency doctor into clinics with suitable care structure. That’s why it does not make sense a foreigner to go directly to the nearest hospital – maybe the patient will be re-directed to another one.
2. Hospitals failed to dispose of emergency wards at all. Establishing an initial diagnosis – that would have made possible to choose a hospital having a suitable clinical ward – remained the everyday task of "basic health provision" – that of the district general practitioner – (today: family doctor). Therefore the establishing of diagnoses was a primarily professional task of GP's – and ambulance officers/emergency doctors (of the National Emergency Service centralized after post world war nationalization too).
If a foreigner go to the hospital without medical referral ( signed by
the GP ) he often will expect a long waiting in the lobby in an
inappropriate facility. 3. According to the Hungarian medical regulation it is prohibited to release medical information for anybody without the prior consent of the patient. The telephone consultation is highly prohibited.
On the other hand, the extremely overburdened treating doctor has neither time nor any obligation to inform the operator or doctor of insurance company by telephone.
That why SOS Hungary encourage its partner to utilize the SOS doctor’s possibilities to regain direct information from the hospital.
SOME USEFUL ADVICE FOR BRIDGING OVER THE PROBLEMS:
Ø If your client has medical problem, let see her/him the SOS doctor first. The SOS doctor has license for referring the patient to hospital. He knows the most appropriate hospital facility available. The clients often not required any inpatient treatment, and the out patient treatment by the SOS doctor is cheaper and more effective at patient’s home. Moreover, the patient needs not facing neither with the language barrier in the hospital, not the long waiting time. Ø SO, USE THE LOCAL MEDICAL PROVIDER WHENEVER POSSIBLE Ø ASK FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE VERY BEGINNING Ø INFORM THE LOCAL PARTNER ABOUT THE EVACUATION DATE IN TIME Ø LET THE LOCAL FORCES ORGANIZE THE HOSPITAL - TO - AIRPLANE TRANSFER THEMSELVES - BUT UPON YOUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS Ø TRUST YOUR LOCAL PARTNERS - THEY KNOW THE LOCAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND WILL ACT AS HONESTLY AS YOU WOULD |
![]()